Nuwun Sewu

Bagi siapa saja yang punya INFO MENARIK mengenai perSEPEDAan atau barangkali ada yang mau titip JUAL .. atau mau BELI .. atau mau TUKER-TUKERAN .. atau mau SHARING aja .. monggo silahkan kirim DATA plus FOTO nya ke email : funbikepml@gmail.com

Friday, June 26, 2009

ISTIRAHAT di TAMAN MINI #2


Om BAGOES lagi khusyuk berdoa apa kekenyangan ya?

posted by : han

ISTIRAHAT di TAMAN MINI


wah .. wah .. Mas BOWO pose nya boleh juga tuh !!!

posted by : han

Thursday, June 25, 2009

LEONIS BICYCLE FRAME



nah .. kalo yg ini incerannya Om BAGOES .. tp .. sy juga naksir

posted by : han

BIANCHI BICYCLE FRAME


i REALLY LOVE IT .. KAPAN YA?

posted by : han

TITUS BICYCLE FRAME


posted by : han

TITANIUM BICYCLE FRAMES


Track Frame Triathlon/TT
(650/700) Frame

bicycle frames
Razor

bicycle frames
KGB





Cyclocross/Touring
Frame & Fork
Road/Touring Frames
cyclocross, touring bicycle frame
Cossack

titanium bicycle frames
Czar





Hardtail MTB Frames

22-niner

mountain bike frames for sale
Siberian

posted by : han

CERVELO R3 SL


posted by : han

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

FRAME made in CHINA


posted by : han

BICYCLE FRAMES, The HEART Of The BIKE

by : Samuel mascarell
© copyright by bikecyclingreviews.com

The design of the bicycle frame has not changed much over the years, but the materials have. The original bike was a hobbyhorse that you pushed along with your feet on the ground; this original was made from wood.


The bicycle frame was for many years manufactured in steel, the first frames were very heavy and the angles were very laid back and with a long wheel base, which made for a comfortable ride on the rough roads of the time, but would not be responsive for today's fast roads and race conditions.

Steel bicycle frames over the years got lighter and lighter by making the tubes thinner and joining them without the use of lugs.

A big change came in the manufacture of frames when alloy tubes could be joined to each other strongly and safely to make responsive and very light frames, the tubes had to be bigger, but they could be made in aero-dynamic shapes.

Titanium Bike Frames

If you have the money titanium or an all carbon frame would be your choice, much more expensive. But in the case of titanium if it made correctly it will last a lifetime.

Titanium is very light but will give you a hard ride, mixing titanium main tubes with carbon forks and back end would be the best for handling and for comfort.

Carbon Fiber Bike Frames

An all carbon frame at the moment seems to be what every one wants.

Although titanium is very nice, carbon fiber frames are more affordable and probably more popular. Some of the nicest bike frames on the market are carbon, most of the big and famous frame builders now make at least one carbon fibre bike frame.

The most famous of these are Giant, Colnago, De Rosa, Look, Trek and Pinarello and there are many, many more, all very beautiful.

trek carbon frames



















Trek carbon Frame

Look carbon frame

pinarello carbon frame

Pinarello Magnesium frame
(Oscar Pereiro Bike - Tour de France winner)


Colnago carbon frame (Denis Menchov)

Orbea carbon frame


Scott carbon frame (David Millar)


BH All Carbon frame (Alexander Vinokourov)


Ridley carbon frame
(Fred Rodriguez - 3 times U.S. Pro Cycling Champion)

Carbon fiber bike frames can be constructed in three different ways, they can be made in one piece, with the carbon material wrapped in different directions for strength and lightness or tubes can be made more like ordinary alloy or steel frames and then joined directly or with lugs.

All are good and strong and give a comfortable ride and all the strength that you put into pressing on the pedals will go into pushing you forward on the road.

Bike manufacturers, Giant are one of the leaders in carbon fiber frame making, they were the first to build a frame that came in at under 1 kilogram and at an affordable price.


There are many frame builders using carbon fiber and all have different designs as carbon can be moulded or wrapped in many different shapes, not just round profiles.

These can be flat for aerodynamics or square for strength or as with most carbon fiber bike frames a mixture of many shapes for a mixture of strength, comfort, aerodynamics and style and they come in any colour, usually black to show off that beautiful carbon fiber weave.

All the main frame manufacturers make one, some with lugs (Trek, Colnago, Cervelo), some without (Scott, De Rosa, Battaglin) and some monocoque (Giant, Trek).

The monocoque designs can have tubes in any shape, but are a little heavier. Basically buy the best bicycle frame you can afford.

Alloy Bike Frames

Alloy bicycle frames are now most people's choice combined with carbon forks and in some cases carbon chain and seat stays at the back.

posted by : han




GIANT STP FRAME 2008


woow .. GIANT STP FRAME 2008 .. one of the best colour combination bike frame ..
bikin ane kesengsem abiiss !!!



posted by : han

HOW TO BUY A BICYCLE


by: Tom Holub

This seems like as good a time as any to discuss purchasing and sizing a bicycle. If you already have a bike and aren't interested in getting another one, you can skip down to the Sizing section. Having more than one bike is way cool, though, especially if your bike is your only form of transportation.

I'll start by saying that low-end bike-store bikes have gotten a lot better over the last 10 years; you can't really go wrong. As a general rule, it's worth spending extra money up to about $700 or $800;after that you're paying for stuff you don't really need. If the guy at the bike store is telling you about some cool feature the bike has (like under-bar push-button shifters) you are probably paying for stuff you don't need. The features you need on your bike are pedals that go around, brakes that work and shifters that work; everything else is vestigal. That's not to say that you should buy the cheapest functional bike; you should just be aware that extras aren't really necessary.

Note that I said low-end *bike-store* bikes. Do not buy bikes from Target, Toys R Us, or any other non-bike store. Those bikes are cheap in dangerous ways; the brakes are particularly bad. They're heavy, they're constructed by morons, and they are practically impossible to adjust properly. Do yourself a favor, buy a reasonable bike. Expect to spend $250; in this case, you get more than what you pay for.

I should get some terms defined here. Your frame has 4 tubes:

TOP TUBE: The, uh, top tube. The rear brake cable usually runs along it.

SEAT TUBE: The tube that holds the SEAT POST.

DOWN TUBE: The other main tube, the diagonal one on the bottom. It has shifters on some road bikes, usually has waterbottle brazes, and the shifter cables usually run along it.

HEAD TUBE: *Not* a cheesy porn flick. This is the short tube that connects the down tube to the top tube. Inside it are the

STEERER TUBE and the STEM.

STEERER TUBE: The tube connected to the FORK (which holds the front wheel) and the STEM through the HEAD TUBE.

STEM: Controls the STEERER TUBE and holds the handlebars. It is adjusted via an allen bolt (usually) on the top.

SEAT POST: Holds the seat. It is adjusted by a bolt at the top of the

SEAT TUBE. It holds the seat in a clamp; the seat is adjusted via a bolt on this clamp.
I look for the following minimal features in a bike:

ALUMINUM WHEELS: Not only are they lighter than steel, they're easier to keep in adjustment, and they are *much* better at braking when wet. They say that upgrading your wheels is the easiest way to upgrade the performance of your bike; start off with good ones.

NO IDIOT LEVERS: If your bike is a road bike with the curved "drop" handlebars, the brakes are mounted on the "hooks." On cheap bikes, in addition to the main brake lever, there is another lever that extends inwards, parallel to the bars. Do not buy a bike with these; they are extremely dangerous (they don't brake well enough to use in an emergency) and they're a sign that the bike is not designed well. If your bike has these levers, I suggest removing them.

NO STEM SHIFTERS: Again, this is for road bikes; on some bikes, the shifters are mounted on the stem (the thing that holds the handlebars). The idea is that they're closer to your hands and therefore easier to use; the reality is that you have to raise your center of gravity while twisting your body to use them. They also are very susceptible to being hit by your knees while climbing (a very bad scene), and in an accident they can wind up goring your throat. Insist on down-tube or bar-end shifters for road bikes.

As you probably know, there are three main types of bikes:

ROAD BIKES: Dropped handlebars, thin tires, down-tube shifters. Road bikes are lightweight and fast and have significant advantages over the other types for road riding. They can also ride on packed dirt roads without much trouble; they can't ride in loose dirt or sand. One drawback road bikes have in Berkeley is that, because of their narrow tires, they don't handle bumps and potholes as well as the other types. One advantage they have is that thieves don't seem to be interested in them.
Touring bikes, such as the Bridgestone RB-T, are road bikes with wider tires and a more relaxed geometry to handle bumps better. I find them to be excellent for commuting; my main commuting bike is a Schwinn Voyageur (sadly, Schwinn no longer makes it). They are slower than other road bikes but faster than the other types.

One problem you'll have buying a road bike is that most bike stores don't carry inexpensive ones, so you'll find it difficult to get a test ride on anything cheaper than $500. Since I highly recommend a test ride, this is a significant drawback.

MOUNTAIN BIKES: Straight handlebars, big knobby tires, handlebar shifters. Mountain bikes own the lion's share of the new bike market; they're fun to ride and cool to look at (people who want to look at their bikes rather than ride them tend to buy mountain bikes). They are great at handling bumps and can also ride in loose dirt or on singletrack trails. They are significantly slower than road bikes on roads; just yesterday I was riding my mountain bike and felt like I had no energy at all. They also are targets for thieves in Berkeley; if you own a mountain bike, be prepared to take extra precautions to protect it.
Mountain bikes are viewed as being more comfortable because your riding position is more upright; this is incorrect. This position is more comfortable only while you're looking at the bike, or perhaps sitting on it in the bike store. It puts more strain on your lower back, and the lack of extra hand positions also causes problems on long rides. Mostly because of the theft issue, I can't in good faith recommend a mountain bike for commuting in Berkeley. If you're looking for a bike you can take anywhere, or if you specifically want to ride off-road, mountain bikes are great, but I think taking them to campus every day is a bad idea unless you have a private office where you can keep them.

HYBRIDS: After the mountain bike boom of the early 80's, people started realizing that they weren't riding their mountain bikes off-road. Since mountain bikes have significant disadvantages on-road, hybrids were created to combine the features of mountain bikes and road bikes. They usually have an upright riding position but less so than mountain bikes. Their tires are wider than road bikes' but usually not too knobby. They often have handlebars with more hand positions than mountain bikes do.

As you might expect, they are faster than mountain bikes but slower than road bikes. They are theft targets more than road bikes but less than mountain bikes. They are better in loose dirt than road bikes but aren't really appropriate for serious off-road riding. I find that hybrids make decent commuting bikes, but the upright riding position makes them undesirable for long rides. For around-town riding they're good though. There tend to be a lot of hybrid selections under $500 since they're aimed at casual users.

There are also recumbents (bikes on which you sit on what looks like a deck chair) and tandems. Recumbents are comfortable and attract a lot of attention; they are bad at climbing hills but good at flats and downhills. There's a growing recumbent market. Tandems (two-man bicycles) are the most fun you can have on two wheels, but good ones are expensive.

HOW TO CHOOSE A BIKE
First, obviously, you need to decide how much money you are prepared to spend. I advise being generous, as I said earlier; spending extra money will get you a better bike. Expect to spend at least $250; you won't get many choices at that level so realistically you should expect to spend $300. If you can't afford to spend that much, you can get good deals on good used bikes. If you look around lots of people never ride their bikes and eventually wind up just dumping them. A used quality bike will serve you much better than a new Target junker.

Once you have a price range, head to a bike store. Do not allow yourself to be rushed; test-ride a number of bikes and don't skimp on the rides (details on test riding below). Consider theft resistance; does the bike have a quick-release seat that you'll need to buy a cable for, or take with you? Look at the frame joints; are the welds (or brazes) clean or sloppy? Are the wheels true? The brake lever end should have a maximum travel of about 2 inches (a little less for mountain bikes) and you should not be able to bottom it out. Are the brakes sidepull or cantilever? (Cantilever brakes are mounted on pivots on the fork and seatstays, with the main cable pulling a transverse cable, which straddles the wheel. Sidepulls are mounted directly above the wheel with the cable pulling them together on one side.) Cantilever brakes are good if you plan to put fenders on the bike (which immensely improves cycling in the rain). Sidepull brakes tend to work more smoothly and stay in adjustment better.

HOW TO TEST RIDE A BIKE

The main things you're interested in on a test ride are to find out how the bike handles bumps, to find out how the brakes and shifters work, and to see if it was well-built. Before you go to the bike shop you should have a plan for where you intend to take the bikes you test. Take the bike on Hearst or somewhere similar; how much does it jar you when you're going downhill? When it hits bumps, do you hear unexplained rattles? You should expect your rear derailleur to snap when you hit bumps, but if other things on the bike are rattling it's a sign that something is cheap or poorly fitting.

To test the shifters, start by riding on a flat road and shifting through all the gears. Does it easily shift into the lowest gear? If you over-shift into the lowest gear, does the derailleur sound like it wants to self-destruct into the spokes? (If it does, stop over-shifting, but that's a count against the bike.) Does it shift cleanly into the highest gear, without jumping over the end? Can you shift between the front chainrings easily, without the chain jumping off? On a triple crankset it can be expected that the chain will jump off sometimes when shifting to the smallest chainring, but on a double it should never hop off and it should never hop off when shifting to the large chainring. Try out each cog for a while; does the chain run smoothly and quietly on each cog, or does it chatter or jump off one or more?

Try to downshift while pedaling uphill; it's harder to shift with tension on the chain and cheaper shifting systems will fail to. If you're spending$500 or more, though, you should insist that the bike be able to make this shift cleanly.

When you're riding uphill, do you hear pinging sounds in the wheels? If you do, they were poorly built; the sounds will eventually go away but the wheel will need to be re-trued.

Head downhill and hit the brakes; do you stop smoothly? Do you feel like you have control over your deceleration? Cantilever brakes are somewhat rougher than side pulls and feel spongier, so expect that.

Walk the bike while turning the handlebars, do they turn smoothly through their range of motion, or does it feel like there are notches at various points (especially straight ahead)? Try some medium-speed turns on pavement; does the bike corner solidly (if a road bike; knobby-tire bikes corner horribly on pavement)?

If you are planning on riding off-road, find a dirt trail or two (there are some on campus) and see how the bike handles them; can you accelerate from low speed on the dirt? Can you turn without skidding? Can you shift on a bumpy section?
As I said, try out a number of different bikes in your price range; there's no way to measure how good a bike feels to you. And most importantly, once you buy it, RIDE BIKE!

SIZING A BIKE
There is no formula to determine perfect bike size and adjustment; there are plenty of rules of thumb, but really bike adjustments are a highly personal thing. You are the only one who can determine your perfect setup.

That said, here are some rules of thumb: Your seat height should be adjusted so that your leg is almost fully extended at the bottom of your pedal stroke. Test this by sitting on the bike leaning against a wall. Put your heels on the pedals and pedal backwards; your leg should be fully extended at the bottom. Most people adjust their seats too low; I've seen "cycle safety" manuals that recommend keeping your seat low enough that you can put both feet on the ground while sitting on your seat (HINT: Do not do this). Low seat height is the major cause of cycling knee injuries.

You can adjust the tilt of the seat by loosening the bolt on the clamp underneath it. Most people are comfortable when their seat is level, or tilted just slightly forward, but again, this is mostly a matter of personal preference. I've ridden comfortably with a seat tilted back.

Stem height is another preference thing; most people are comfortable when the height of the stem is about the same as the height of the seat; higher will give a more upright riding position, lower will bend you over more. Mountain bikes usually have stems that place the handlebars a little higher than the seat to promote the upright riding position.
Stem extension is a measure of how far in front of the head tube the stem holds the handlebars. It cannot be adjusted without buying a new stem, but you might be able to get a good bike shop to swap stems on anew bike. If it feels like the handlebars are too far away, a stem with a shorter extension (ahem) might be good for you. If you have along torso, a longer extension could help.

If you have dropped handlebars, the tilt of the bars can also be adjusted; usually the bolt is under the stem where it clamps the handlebars. As a general rule, the end of the bars should be aiming at a point somewhere between the top and the center of the rear wheel, but again, that's a preference thing. Some people do wacky things with the bars, pointing the ends straight up in the air or having them upside down. I recommend against that; it invites impalement. Also, ALWAYS keep something stuffed in the end of your bars, whether it's the plug that game with the handlebar tape, a fancy expander plug, or a champagne cork.
That's about it for the adjustments. Always remember that your gut feelings are more important than the rules of thumb; if you are more comfortable, especially on long rides, with some non-standard setup, by all means use it. And by all means, ride that bike!


Privacy | Submit News | Corrections | Contact Total Bike

Copyright 1998-2009 TotalBike.com All Rights Reserved
Powered by hoZt.com

posted by : han

The ROAD WAR -- Shimano vs. Campagnolo


by: David Diaz Blanco

Campagnolo was the manufacturer that invented derailleurs, and Shimano is the company that nowadays dominates the bicycle market with iron hand. This results in a war where each little movement of the enemy requires an inmediate response. And as always happens in wars, everybody has to take party. We will try to be impartial, and stablish a true comparative between the flag ships of both contenders.

This war started in the mid eighties, when Shimano developed their SIS, the first indexed system that became really successful. This made Campagnolo lose an important part of their market share in the earlier nineties. That age was not easy for Campagnolo: The bicycle world was shaken by the quick evolution of MtB, Shimano and SunTour introduced novelties almost every six months and the Italian company seemed not to be able to compete the Japanese brands.

Finally, Campagnolo decided to leave the MtB market, and focus theirselves on what they knew the best: The road field. By 1995, the Campagnolo range was a truly alternative to Shimano products, and that was too the year that Maeda sold the SunTour brand to Sakae Ringyo, what, in fact, meant a competitor less.

For 2000, and after some years of constant successes, the Italians introduced what a year after has proved to be a revolution that has put Shimano against the wall: The first ten speed rear shifting system. It is not that the Japanese company has lost much of their sales, but lots of road bikers think today that Campagnolo builds the most advanced groupos avalaible. That stands for prestige.

To clear up which one is the best componentry that can be achieved nowadays, we have tested the more expensive each one offers: Shimano Dura Ace and Campagnolo Record.

The best groupos ever?
First of all, it is needed to clear up that both products can suit any road cyclist in the world. Both them are reliable, offer a perfect function of any of their parts, and both them feature the latest technologies to insure a very light weight. So, from the beginning, it is needed to say that, in most cases, there are very slightly differences.

What we will try to explain in this article is which one comes closer to the utopic idea of Perfection. The people that buys these groupos spends lots of money on bikes, so a good shifting or braking action is not enough for them. Furthermore, the pros that use these products need something that, at least, have no influence in the final result of each race. So, a mechanical failure in the middle of a competition is something unacceptable, and so is too any disadvantage due to any componentry’s characteristic.

A general view
Before describing and comparing each component, we will have a look at what Dura Ace and Record offer as a whole. Today´s groupos are a set where each piece is designed to work in synchrony with some others, instead of being just a mix of pieces manufactured by the same company as happened 15 years ago. Indexed systems, the struggle for weight saving and other technical advances make that sometimes only the front hub, the seat post or the head set has not influence on how the rest of the components work.

There are a lot of independent manufacturers that build products that are compatible with Campy or Shimano groupos, and sometimes they improve the function of the original component in some way, or save a few grams; but my personal experience tells me that you should be very careful when choosing a substitute for an original piece. The most extreme example are Campagnolo brakes: They are suppossed to be compatible with any wheel, and they are, but their pads work best with Campy rims.

It is really pleasant for a bicycle devotee as I am to handle these components. The materials they are made of, and the way how that materials have been worked have almost no comparison with any other product from a different field. Only Formula 1 cars have so much technology hidden in every little piece. Maybe you think this is an exaggeration, but it is not. The way Campagnolo and Shimano (and some other bicycle manufacturers) forge aluminum, and the way Campagnolo works carbon fiber allows both companies to be among the best mechanical componetry manufacturers of the world. And that is why sometimes Ferrari and NASA rely on Campagnolo to build some pieces.

The Japanese components use cold forged aluminum. This procces insures the best possible molecular cohesion, the way each component is extremely strong. But forging cold aluminum is very difficult, because aluminum´s plasticity is low at low temperatures, so extremely high forces are needed to accurately shape it. There are only a few companies in the world that can build cold forged aluminum pieces with the tolerances that Shimano uses.

Campagnolo is known worldwide by metallurgic enginneers as a company that has developed some procceses that nowadays are used by many high precision mechanical devices manufacturers. And the Record is a summary of the most advaced ones. Campagnolo uses both cold and heat forging techniques depending on which piece. Sometimes, using the extremely high forces that cold forging procceses need result in microfissures, only viewable by very powerful microscopes, depending on which alloy is used, so sometimes is better to use a less plastic alloy and forge it at a higher temperature, submiting later the piece to a heat treatment proccess that avoid inner stresses that could appear.

The proccess that should be used for each case is determined by an accurate research of which forces apply to each piece when it is working.

Record’s carbon pieces are truly examples of the highest technology avalaible today. It can seem easy to substitute an aluminum piece for a carbon one, but that is not so easy if that piece has little pivots that turn inside of it. That is that case in the rear derailleur of the ErgoPower. Only the latest techniques allow these pieces to be manufactured in a way they don’t wear or break after a week.

The Dura Ace announces a better force transmission on its drivetrain due to the Octalink interface between cranks and spindle, and Campagnolo allows to mount 10 cogs on the rear wheel.

But this is not all what they have to offer. Next week will will start the comparison!



Campagnolo vs Shimano Part II


Privacy | Submit News | Corrections | Contact Total Bike

Copyright 1998-2009 TotalBike.com All Rights Reserved
Powered by hoZt.com

posted by : han
Web Hosting
Web Hosting

KERJA SANTAI .. INCOME LUAR BIASA